Jump to content

V12 TDi Q7


cruiser647
 Share

Recommended Posts

:roflmao:

Not read it yet, but I know the V12 Q7 is slower round Bedford than the Fiat 500 Abarth.

Something to do with lack of cornering ability :eek:

He's out on real roads chasing the Hamster on his GSX1300 bike, and seems impressed that the bike cannot really pull away (rider dependent, he acknowledges!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, I don't mean a Q7, Dave, just the V12 TDI Q7.

I wouldn't have one because I don't like SUVs or the look of the Q7. I've driven a 3.0TDI and it's a great luxury barge, just not for me.

If you want more oomph, buy a V8, but why buy a V12 TDI, other than if you're a footballer...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok .. get ya...

i agree.. Why anyone would shed out almost double what the V8 tdi costs is beyond me... My Q7 does 0 to 60 in around 6 and a half seconds.. it will cost you £40,000 more to shave one second off that, and as you say.. it's no better around the corners. :eek:

I reckon residuals will also be shockingly bad.. i could be tempted by a second hand one should they half in price within 24 months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a look for a used one a couple of months back, oddly enough there were none listed by Audi and only a couple in the other haunts.

I'd be interested to have a go, I had a Q7 3.0 for a week as a loaner from Audi. I found it horridly slow and ponderous, to actually get it moving at any sensible rate required a lot of gas. Fuel consumption wasn't good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

The point of the v12 tdi is for audi to show what they can do. And let rich bastards like me buy it lol. The V12 wasnt built to go around the race track, it wasnt built to race against porsche cayennes. Its just to show that they can make something powerful. The people at Audi aint stupid. They know that theyll hardly sell any of them and even if they do itll go to the rich people adding to their car collection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The point of the v12 tdi is for audi to show what they can do. And let rich bastards like me buy it lol. The V12 wasnt built to go around the race track, it wasnt built to race against porsche cayennes. Its just to show that they can make something powerful. The people at Audi aint stupid. They know that theyll hardly sell any of them and even if they do itll go to the rich people adding to their car collection.

Exactly, believe it or not there will be a market for these. Maybe in the US or UAE, but not really in Britain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really do like the idea of a V12 Q7, really I do - I'd consider changing the RS 6 for one.

Here's why I don't think I'm crazy: After the 580 PS tour-de-force that is the RS 6, what other vehicle on earth could one moment be driving granny to the shops, then the next moment blasting along a country road in front of a sports bike, showing him a clean pair of heels round all but the tightest corners, then the next moment loading a fridge-freezer into the back and still spanking the majority of Porsches out there away from the lights?

Nothing. Nothing else out there that I know of has the blend of luxury, relaxation, comfort, load-carrying ability and outright fire-breathing lunacy of an RS 6 Avant.

So, what the hell do you do when a year and a quarter in, and Audi still haven't made a replacement? Last time round, the last RS 6 was replaced with an equally horsepowered W12, then the S8. Where's the A8 V10T with 580PS then? Doesn't exist. And what a huge pity that is. :(

So, if I have to either accept a car that can't load more than one slice of Kraft cheese in the luggage area, or one that's ponderously slow and liable to being kept up with by milk floats, or heaven forbid, Kias or Daewoos.

Or do I? Yes, a V12 Q7 is slower than an RS 6 and it will not go round corners the same way.

But, it will do one thing the RS 6 does wonderfully that is a boon to me every single day in the rural county I live in. It overtakes. Not just a bit, but a lot. Eight cars behind a lorry behind a tractor doing 35 mph, and nobody's going anywhere. Apart from the cocky b*****d in the RS 6 who kicks it down into 2nd and has the lot in under 100 meters. Even with a fridge-freezer on board.

How many times have I had the RS 6 on a track? None. How many times would I expect to have a Q7 on track? None. No loss there then.

So, what's stopping me? The rather extortionate list price, to be honest. It makes a new Range Rover supercharged look like a steal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

as you know i have the V8 tdi and it's a great car, and as comments go, i get more in this than i ever did in the rs!

In fact i was doing the school run a couple of weeks ago and a mum i know came up to me and sked me what it's like to drive a 4 and a half litre engine!!. i lamely replied that it was much like driving anything else!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would never buy one for it's sheer size and price tag, but I do accept there is a market, albeit a small one.

BMW know it as they are bringing out the X5M, Mercedes know it as they have the ML AMG, and Porsche the Cayenne Turbo. So it's not Lunacy on the manufacturers part... just too much spare cash amonst a minority of consumers. Audi will probably make more cash on one V12 than 20 A3's, so i'm sure the economics stack up.

I just spent a week in Truro Dave, what a lovely city that is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Audi will probably make more cash on one V12 than 20 A3's, so i'm sure the economics stack up.

Premium manufacturers really don't make money on small cars, and the big ones have been subsidising them somewhat. It's something the industry needs to get to grips with, according to The Economist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just spent a week in Truro Dave, what a lovely city that is?

Yea, great city, albeit a little bit small in the shopping stakes.

Truro Audi are just up the road and a great bunch of guys +++

PS.. Q7 is just a class motor.. ticks so many boxes.. Ok, looks are take it or leave it but it's also just capable of everything you could wish for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Premium manufacturers really don't make money on small cars, and the big ones have been subsidising them somewhat. It's something the industry needs to get to grips with, according to The Economist.

Did I read somewhere that a car needs to cost upwards of £7k before the manufacturer makes their money back?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Did I read somewhere that a car needs to cost upwards of £7k before the manufacturer makes their money back?

Wouldn't surprise me if it's very marginal below 7 or 8 grand, regardless of volume of sales or cheapness of construction, not in a "Western market" car anyway (I guess Tata could do something cheaper just about).

of course, at the other extreme, there's the Veyron effect, where R&D is just so expensive, you don't anticipate making money, and just do it as a halo exercise.

The problem for carmakers seems to be the whole sub 10 grand market, where feature creep was fine while they were making bucket loads of money from "big cars" full of toys to fund R&D (it's not just marketing that means new gadgets come out in premium cars first!) of technology to filter down when manufacturing costs reduce through efficiency and volume.

If the small car trend carries on, I can see development cycles for chassis and major mechanicals slowing down, and more refreshes and facelifts of existing base platforms, apart from the flurry of "green" activity to meet environmental targets.

I think VW/Audi have made a smart move with MLP, and it could put them ahead of the game. Either way, it's going to be an interesting four to five years for the industry, then another period of serious change for the following five.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...