Jump to content

Football results today


Luke
 Share

Recommended Posts

He will be forever known as David Giggs :roflmao:

An absolute classic - and the slip up in introducing him as David in the Press meeting must have broken the ice and made for a better interview overall (for Giggsie), I suspect.

You have to love human frailties at times..........!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, if there is a David Giggs, at least we know Ryan's probably shagged his wife.

That tag is never going to go away either!!

Do the players now call him Ryan, Boss, David or just Shagger??

Edited by TP27
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

News in the Dutch press this morning that United have already approached Van Gaal. :

Out of interest - ManU are nearly £400 Million in debt and servicing interest on that debt is one of their highest annual costs. Moyer cost £10 Million to 'remove' so increasing debt by the Club is not a concern....

So - can they afford Van Gaal and if so, how much will he cost and if all does not work out with him either, how much will it cost to 'remove' him too?

These costs do not take account of the need to buy in new players, pay the existing squad, including Mata and Shrek nor the cost of not qualifying for the CL.

David Gibbs might just be a very cheap option, if he can cut it ??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The debt 'issue' is vastly over hyped.  The revenues of the club are collosal.  The sponsorship deals are almost all 3-5 year deals so the club is largely unaffected by what would have been a maximum loss of £30m from no Champions League football next year.

 

There is £150 million (some reports say £200m) to buy players with, over £100m of which is there in cash. 

 

The club doesn't have any issues at all servicing what it owes - there are lots of others with much less debt but in much more precarious positions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suppose when you relate these figures to the reported losses of the like of RBS and Co-Op Bank (and others in the Financial Sector), the figures and prospective spend of ManU going forward look like loose change !!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is still a chance the Glazers' debt loading of the club will cause problems, but the most likely scenario was a collapse of other Glazer businesses in the US recession affecting their ability to restructure United debt when they needed to. In particular there were fixed term policies that would have incurred punishing interest rates if the Glazers had been unable to settle them and move the debt elsewhere. Having now done that, and the worst of the US recession now behind us, the club's finances are in a healthier position and certainly able to survive a season (or two?) out of the Champions League.

 

I still think the way the Glazers bought the club should be illegal. And it does make you wonder where the club might be now if it hadn't had to service such colossal debt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The people who wish doom on the club financially always miss the same point too - the fact there would be a queue of middle east billionairres wanting to buy the club off them.

 

The last valuation was around £1.2 billion - even with the debt.

 

Oh absolutely. That has always been the saving grace. I'm just a bit disappointed it hasn't happened yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well that changed when he brought Mata on, but well done to him for recognising it needed to be done.

 

A good result but still the same type of performance.

 

I'm not sure anything was learned from today other than the fact the days of Ferdinand and Vidic are long gone.

 

I still don't think Kagawa has a place in the team, and Valencia has to go too.  So that's 3 more on top of Vidic going in my book.  Oh and Cleverley?  No.

 

However, well done Ryan Giggs in a game that could easily have been a banana skin.  I'm pleased.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...