Jump to content

Volvo C30 T5 Vs......


VRO6MO
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

[ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]

I'm not surprised the Volvo came last, it looks hideous

[/ QUOTE ]

It may shock you to learn that most motoring mags - yes, even Auto Express - base the results of their road tests on more than just looks. grin.gif

[/ QUOTE ]

Surprisingly I'm not shocked, most commercial magazines usually rate the cars in order of the amount of advertising or perks the manufacturers heap on them, but anyway it's still hideous Flush.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]

What's the outcome?

[/ QUOTE ]

1st R32

2nd BMW 130i M sport

3rd Audi S3

4th Volvo C30 T5 LUX

jump.gif169144-ok.gif

[/ QUOTE ]

I must say that I'm not at all suprised at the S3 coming in where it did. Given the type of car it is, you could by an Scooby WRX for less money and get the same 'type' of car if you understand what I mean. The R32's V6 sets it apart from the rest in this group followed by the 3.0 1.gif which again dung.gif's all over both the S3 and 'My name's Sven from Schveeded and I drive a Volvo'.

Well that's my thought anyway!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]

AZ wont be best pleased... ROLLEY~14.GIF

[/ QUOTE ]

I will be 169144-ok.gif

S3 Figures

0-60 5.6s

0-100 13.8s

30-70 5.2s

R32 Figures

0-60 6.3s

0-100 17.8s

30-70 5.9s

130i Figures

0-60 6.0s

0-100 15.6s

30-70 5.4s

Volvo C30 T5 Figures

0-60 7.0s

0-100 18.2s

30-70 6.4s

AZ

[/ QUOTE ]

holy camoly batman......

that s3 is one fast car eh....

i'm suprised its so much quicker to 100 than the r32 mind

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was very tempted by a C30 T5 last year when I saw one at the MPH show, but then I found it's only got two back seats, and I need three.

At least that's my excuse for not buying a car that looks like it's been shagged by a moose from behind.

Don't start all this "R32 is better than the S3" stuff again. They're different cars. It depends which journo is doing the test as to which one comes first 169144-ok.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]

AZ wont be best pleased... ROLLEY~14.GIF

[/ QUOTE ]

I will be 169144-ok.gif

S3 Figures

0-60 5.6s

0-100 13.8s

30-70 5.2s

R32 Figures

0-60 6.3s

0-100 17.8s

30-70 5.9s

130i Figures

0-60 6.0s

0-100 15.6s

30-70 5.4s

Volvo C30 T5 Figures

0-60 7.0s

0-100 18.2s

30-70 6.4s

AZ

[/ QUOTE ]

holy camoly batman......

that s3 is one fast car eh....

i'm suprised its so much quicker to 100 than the r32 mind

[/ QUOTE ]

Indeed I am shocked too new it was quick but that is matching some expensive cars 0-100 times. Suspect the reduced time is due to the weight, the S3 is about 120 Kg's lghter than the R32 with DSG I believe.

Good result for the R32 car in Autoexpress 169144-ok.gif

AZ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...